Monthly Archive for February, 2009

Hi, I’m An Atheist

I’ve been hedging around this for a while and finally decided to “come out.” It’s now Sunday, so I thought I’d just throw symbolism to the wind and make a statement. Frankly, this has been a long time coming. Shocking? I’m sure it is for some, but for others, I’m guessing it comes as no surprise. Do you want to hear me say it? Okay, “I’m an Atheist.” I know, I bet your skin is crawling right now. That word, for some, truly seems to connote ideas of underhandedness, cheap shots, intolerance, and grandiosity. Though I disagree, such an argument is not the topic of this post. As such, I won’t to much into my logic or spend lots of time “making my case.” I’ll save that for another time. So, on to the meat.

Why?
As I said, this has been a long time coming. Many of you who know me well understand I have struggled with religion for a LONG time (like, I don’t remember ever NOT struggling with it). I was completely devoid of religion for the majority of my young adult life and, after some serious drama, decided I needed to really find god as, growing up, I’d never truly believed in a god. I moved, got active in the LDS church again, got married, and lived life. Looking back on it now, I realized how snowed I was. I traded my logic, doubt, understanding and skepticism for a false sense of comfort. I put aside unanswerable questions that had long burned in my heart in order to make sense of the chaos that, a decade ago, seemingly engulfed my life. Of course, it wasn’t long lasting. Three years into my religious life, the doubt came back; and this time with a vengeance. Whereas some see the grand scale of the universe and the complexity of life as symbols of god, I see them as reasons god could not likely exist (at least in the form in which I had always been taught god existed). As “the surprise” (whose identity I’m purposefully masking) recently said to me, a “good feeling” after earnest prayer simply wasn’t enough to convince me that I was receiving an “answer” and I will honestly say that I never once received an “answer” to my prayers in anyway other than that “good feeling.” As you might imagine, my mind went into overdrive when I realized I got that same “good feeling” after meditating or simply talking about my problems, wants, wishes, or needs with someone else. God, it seemed, had no part in that equation for me.

When?
As previously alluded, things took a serious “left” (*snicker*) turn in 2004, immediately after I moved from the religious microcosm that is Southwestern Utah. Initially, my doubt was fueled by my education. During this time, I was beginning to again see, much like Ghandi did, that though I liked the idea of Christ, most “Christians” were anything but Christ-like. This is not me making shallow judgement and I’m not implying that Christians are bad; I know the people are only part of the religious equation and all religions have their hypocrites. Eventually though, I became utterly disgusted and dismayed with the “tolerance” (not acceptance) that was professed to be shown by Utah’s religious majority. In my view, Christ did not preach tolerance, rather unconditional acceptance. As I see it, most religions (and not just Christian/Protestant sects) cannot allow for universal acceptance because it would simply undo the fabric out of which they are made. Ultimately, regardless of having known better, I decided to stay the course; mostly for the benefit of my family and, frankly, to save a little face and avoid conflict (…and when have I been known to avoid conflict?).

The only person during that time who really had a clue about my true feelings was my father; though Corinne was getting a good idea where I stood. It wasn’t that I refrained from discussing it with my then-wife and did so with my father; I discussed my frustrations with both. But my father, having gone through a similar circumstance, knew where it was going. From 2005, my doubt and skepticism consumed my blind faith and I was left wondering just where I really stood. The chaos of the final months of 2008 finally forced me to admit what I had long suppressed: I don’t care if there is a god and not only do I not care, I think the existence of a god is highly improbable. No longer could I continue trying to convince myself of something I would never come to believe. I recently told “the stoic” that I wished I had the knowledge she had about god; what I didn’t tell her was that I felt guilty for not believing. Not any more.

What?
Soft Atheist, I guess that’s the term for me; the term applies because I don’t absolutely DENY there is a god, but I find the idea of a god extremely improbable and I simply don’t care to try and prove there is not a god (yet, and may never). It’s not that I am simply indifferent towards god (as are Agnostics), I largely don’t believe god exists. Period. Until very recently, I thought it was just that I didn’t care, but really it’s much more than that. Interestingly, I don’t believe (yet, and may never) that it’s my “mission” to convert others to my way of thinking. I’m fully supportive others’ choose to believe as they wish so long as their belief doesn’t severely impact my life and I act in such a way so as not to severely impact others lives with my beliefs. Of course, when I believe lines are crossed (Proposition 8), I will speak my mind fervently. At this point, I’m simply not amenable to any discussion or attempt to sway me otherwise or get me to justify my beliefs. As I see it, the whole point of religion is that it’s inherently “unprovable” and as such, don’t believe it is worth arguing (again, yet). Before I entertain any continued conversation on the issue, I should state I don’t want to hear the “get-out-of-my-country-because-the-US-was-founded-as-a-Christian-nation” crap, because it wasn’t or other derogatory or derissive garbage. I’m open to productive conversation, but I simply don’t care to trade barbs over the issue.

Huh?
Yeah, so I guess that’s about it. If you want to hear more about my de-conversion story, I’d be glad to relate it (not discuss it) to you privately. Perhaps this is a bit of my own projection, but I truly believe there are a great number of people like myself. People who, for whatever reason, cast doubt and their own sensibilities aside to keep up a charade in which they can’t fully act to capacity. Am I saying everyone is a charlatan? No. By all means, no. But, I do believe there are more people – many more people – who feel this way, but are simply incapable or unwilling to come out with. In a strange way, I hope my example changes that for someone, but if not, I’ve at least said my piece.

Senate Bill 187

To Utahs: This is a joke right? Your UTAH representatives are seriously considering a law that would ban “looking drunk” in public and require a 10′ wall to be erected around any place where alcoholic drinks are prepared. Here is my letter to my questionably-competent State Representative, Gene Davis (I’m ashamed to admit he’s a Democrat):

Mr. Davis,

As a substance abuse professional, I am absolutely sickened by the recent cut to state funding for programs that help people with addiction problems. The fact that SB 187 even passed from committee is a slap in the face to those of us who dedicate ourselves and our time to employing *proven* methodologies to assist people who suffer from substance abuse and dependancy rather than wasting taxpayer money on folksy attempts to solve real world problems. The time and money you and your fellow Business and Labor Committee members wasted on this ridiculous discussion would likely have provide a full year of outpatient treatment for one of my clients.

I would be patently lying if I said I wasn’t extremely appalled by this matter. I encourage you to rescind your support of this bill and consider employing tactics that truly HELP people, rather than simply trying to legislate morality.


Jared Ferguson, CSW

Even IF you are patently against the consumption of alcohol, I don’t think any sane person could argue that this bill doesn’t violate personal liberties in a variety of ways. So much for the concept of “free agency.” I wonder how much the idea of LDS folks being a “peculiar people” has become self-fulfilling prophecy?

Links:
Senate panel approves hiding restaurant bartenders

Job Interview

I’m having what I hope to be is my final job interview (at least for a long time) on Thursday. If I get the job I seek, I won’t be calling SLC home for much longer, so it’s a good thing I’m no longer totally averse to the idea of living in Utah Valley. Given the topic of an upcoming blog post, I believe you’ll soon see the irony in my recent acceptance of this fact. I’d say wish me luck, but in my mind, I believe luck has nothing to do with it; I’m either the right man for the job, or I’m not. Fortunately, as opposed to last time I interviewed for this position, I’m actually certified this time around and really believe I am, in fact, that right man for the job. I hope my interviewers will come to believe that as well.

Comings And Goings

As I have progressed through life after marriage, I have been amazed at the dynamics I have witnessed in people as they come in and out of my life or the changes I have seen individuals I consider to be my more permanent fixtures. More specifically, I’m amazed at the differing roles friends/family/coworkers/etc assume and the labels I’ve given them: the on-again/off-again; the flash in the pan; the dirker (ditcher/lurker); the e-stalker; the doormat do-gooder; the concerned; the avoidant; the terminally logical; the platitude; the stoic; the surprise; the loves of my life (okay, that was a giveaway), etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Obviously, such labels certainly stand for specific individuals in my life, but there’s no sense for any of my readers to try and figure out who’s who and the symbolism really doesn’t matter anyway to anyone other than myself. The important thing is this: I learn something from everyone with whom I come into contact; but only a few have made a lasting impact without negating their words through their contrary behaviors. My relationships have been as diverse as the people who make them and through it all, there are but three left standing (not including the loves of my life).

Of these three, one helps me blow off steam (the pendulum mover), one helps me plan for life and be positive about the changes I’ve experienced (the pep-talking rudder), and the other makes sense of situations I fail to see clearly (the sage guru). Of all the above listed individuals, you three should know who you are and frequent readers should easily clue in as well. As I said, I’m not going to name names, but you are all important in my life nonetheless. Rather than, after-the-fact, preaching to others your supposed warnings about my behaviors and their implications, you have been true and steady throughout. Rather than kicking me when I was down, you were down to kick me into shape. Rather than projecting your own weaknesses onto me, you have helped me realize my strengths. Rather than questioning my judgement, you have supported my decisions and done so without prejudice, self-righteousness, or any sense of moral superiority. Rather than taking advantage of what I have to give, you give me so much that I feel as if I’m taking advantage of you. For all of this, I thank you. People, it seems, will always come and go, but the three of you are individuals in whose care I wish find myself ensconced for many, many years to come. Seriously. Thank you.

The Four Magical Chords

I know this has been circulating for a bit, but I just get such a kick out of it. Some songs you may not know, some you will definitely know. Watch for language at 4:40 in. Thanks Johann Pachelbel; thanks for Canon in D and the four magical chords.